9/20/2023 0 Comments Internal mixer camtwist![]() Then these aggregates are absorbed or incorporated into the rubber to form a coherent mass.ĭuring mixing, shearing of the rubber generates shearing stress in rubber mass which imposes in turn shear stress on these aggregates and breaks these into their ultimate fine size which in case of carbon blacks is of the order of about 1µm. During subdivision large lumps or agglomerates are broken down into smaller aggregates suitable for incorporation into the rubber.įor instance carbon black pellets which have dimension of the order of 250-2000 µm get broken down into aggregates with dimensions of the order of 100 µm. Many does support screensharing, but not all of them, and even if they do, adding a camera on top of it is most probably not possible.The mixing of solid ingredients into the solid polymer occurs in phases. ![]() So essentially the use case is to share your screen, but also be able to add stuff to it, like your own webcam, and use that on ANY streaming software. ![]() Messenger does support screenshare but it's weird and doesn,t seems to works if someone is on his phone (which we all were). The issue was that it was quite hard to watch it together while being live together, so I just pointed my phone at my computer screen, but it was far from ideal.Įssentially my goal was to screenshare on my computer and then the sound quality would have been much better. Yesterday (actually 3h before that bounty was posted), I wanted exactly that feature, but I couldn't get it soon enough (I did find obs-virtual-cam at the same time as the bounty was posted, what are the odds).Ī bunch of friends and I were listening to a live quiz, on Facebook and we were in a Messenger video calls together to solve it together. That being said, bounties aren't bad overall, they are definitely great ideas if used here and there, but funding of open source projects shouldn't be bounty-driven. They give more security to maintainers (rent is pretty much a constant for example) and less overhad for users (unless they want to save money and use it most efficiently, but IMO that's not what donations should be about). Regular payments are far better IMO for projects long term because they allow maintainers to actually maintain the software instead of hunting for bug bounties. It leads to annoyance driven development. So that behaviour will lead to maintainers not addressing issues they know will annoy users. ![]() Of course a maintainer is one of the world experts in that codebase so knows really well which things can or have to be done. They'll add it to issues the maintainers won't do otherwise, which in turn leads maintainers to hold the code hostage, not doing something they'd have done had there been no bounty structure, hoping that someone posts a bounty for it. The kind of thinking you expressed in your post that payments shouldn't be seen as "charity" leads to people trying to not "waste" their bounties. ![]() I think bounties create an unhealthy incentive structure. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |